Although "The Villain" has a high-dollar cast (Kirk Douglas, Ann Margret, Arnold the Governator), it belongs on the list of worst westerns???????????, IMO.
I saw this when it had its theatrical release and thought it rather cute and entertaining, despite the gags being telegraphed.
Its hackneyed these days but still has its moments!
If I was to pick a runner up to the "Worst Western", it would have to be "The Terror of Tiny Town", and all midget cast. Sort of a "Munchkin Western".
I have seen only bits and pieces of this film, but the concept itself seems so off-the-wall and ridiculous that I laugh just thinking about it!
QuoteDisplay MoreOriginally posted by Jay J. Foraker@Feb 1 2005, 05:58 PM
You're probably thinking of "Futureworld" which was a sequel of sorts to "Westworld." .
[snapback]14209[/snapback]
Another thought on these two movies (which BTW weren't too bad, to my way of thinking) - "Westworld" had all the conflicts arising from some sort of malise in the system while "Futureworld" had these coming about intentionally by the villains trying to take control of governments around the world by introducing simalicrons under their control which were exact duplicates of world leaders.
Regards - Jay 
Hi Ringo -
You're probably thinking of "Futureworld" which was a sequel of sorts to "Westworld." Had an entirely different cast, save for Yul Brynner. Actually, the concepts were OK, just caught the usual Hollywood disease.
Cheers - Jay :lol:
