Hi -
Disney's "The Alamo" is an ok film taken on its own terms. But in its attempt to be politically correct, it loses the sweep and grandeur of the myth and legend of the events (and the story of the Alamo siege and battle has taken on legendary status). Duke's version captured the happenings magnificently (even though facts were stretched or overlooked for entertainment's sake - but what movie doesn't do that), especially in the glorious filming by director of photography William H. Clothier. Duke was making a movie of entertainment focusing on broad vistas emblazoned with bold strokes. Duke's "The Alamo" makes a lasting impression!
Cheers - Jay 
Posts from Jay J. Foraker in thread „The New Alamo Picture“
-
-
OK - I finally watched the latest version of "The Alamo" the other evening. I would have to say that if I was not familiar with the story, especially as presented by Duke's version, I would have to say that the story line was very murky indeed. I've heard said that this new version was short on characterization and I would agree. Many of the characters were glossed over and, in some cases, I wasn't even sure which person was which. Most of the actors were unknowns to me, so it was hard to focus on the characterizations. With so many participants in the story, Duke was wise to pick recognizable character actors for most of the speaking parts so the audience could readily identify with what was going on (when one could make out what was going on - if someone with no knowledge of the story of the Alamo watched this, they would be lost. I have a feeling that overseas audiences quicky passed out word that this wasn't a good movie simply because they were muddled about the story.) About the only positive element that I found in the movie was the characterization of General Santa Anna. And though the movie was called "The Alamo," the most cohesive part of Disney's version was the Battle of San Jacinto.
Duke's version wins HANDS DOWN - no contest at all.
Cheers - Jay <_<
