Posts by ejgreen77

Participate now!

Don’t have an account yet? Register yourself now and be a part of our community!

    Quote

    Originally posted by SXViper@Dec 5 2006, 01:18 AM
    I don't want to tell anybody what browser to use. I just tell people what works for me and what seems to be less "buggy" for me. That being said I have been using IE 7 on occasion and find that it still has a few bugs in it that are really getting annoying. One being that it seems to want to lock up and I have to end the program using the task manager. When I do that, if I have other IE 7 windows open it closes all them as well. So I just keep chugging along with Firefox and don't get those odd problems that IE seems to always come up with.

    [snapback]37500[/snapback]



    Viper,


    Check your add-ons. I too, had problems at first with IE 7 locking up. I disabled some of the offending add-ons and its worked just fine for me ever since. Apparently, some external add-ons that worked with IE 6 are not compatible with IE 7.


    Robbie,


    If you want to use Internet Explorer, you should update to the new Internet Explorer 7 that was just released a couple weeks ago. It's very similar to Firefox.


    I too had some problems with the old Internet Explorer 6 not working correctly. The update appears to have fixed everything.

    Quote

    Originally posted by ethanedwards@Nov 5 2006, 07:56 AM
    He may have been others, but not that I know of.

    [snapback]36668[/snapback]



    Duke was also the horse in most of the Lone Star films as well, though he didn't get the same build-up Warner was giving him.

    Baby Face (1933) is being released on DVD on December 5, 2006 as part of a "Forbidden Hollywood Collection" along with Red-Headed Woman (1932) and Waterloo Bridge (1931). According to Amazon and DeepDiscount, this release will include two versions of Baby Face; both the pre-Code Director's Cut and the post-Code censored Theatrical Version. Here are the links:



    http://www.amazon.com/Forbidden-Hollywood-...5?ie=UTF8&s=dvd


    http://www.moviesunlimited.com/musite/prod...JH75R7SQTNR7NR4


    http://www.deepdiscountdvd.com/dvd.cfm?itemID=WBD067964

    Quote

    Originally posted by Stumpy@Oct 3 2006, 05:35 PM
    I'll guaran-damn-tee that y'all will like Cooper in "Friendly Persuasion". It's one of the best feel-good movies ever made, of whatever genre.

    [snapback]35338[/snapback]



    Stumpy, I agree with you on Friendly Persuasion. It's definitely a Cooper must-see film. It's available here at DeepDiscountDvd.

    Quote

    Originally posted by The Ringo Kid@Sep 26 2006, 02:31 PM
    Did you know that a 2-dvd set is available which has: Beau Geste, Peter Ibbetson, The Lives of a Bengal Lancer, and two others. You can get that set at Deep Discount DvD for less than 20 bucks.

    [snapback]34913[/snapback]



    Yep, Ringo; that Universal Cooper collection is available here.


    BTW, Warner's Gary Cooper Signature Collection will include the 5 films Sergeant York (1941), The Fountainhead (1949), Springfield Rifle (1952), The Wreck of Mary Deare (1959), and Dallas (1950).


    Sergeant York will be released as a Two-Disc Special Edition DVD. Here are the links:


    http://www.amazon.com/Gary-Cooper-Signatur...3?ie=UTF8&s=dvd


    http://www.moviesunlimited.com/musite/prod...3KB38RVSQJ2E981


    http://www.deepdiscountdvd.com/dvd.cfm?itemID=WBD082993

    Well, the 10 winners have been announced, and they are:


    The Illustrated Man
    Operation Crossbow
    Presenting Lily Mars
    There Was a Crooked Man
    Up Periscope
    The Arrangement
    Band of Angels
    Gymkata
    Looker
    Madame Curie


    Five of these titles will be released in December, the other five in January. In addition, Warner & Amazon are partnering together to release Angels in the Outfield and Best Foot Forward exclusively through Amazon, so hopefully that will be a precursor to a widespread national release for those two films as well. You can check out all the details at:


    http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/browse/-/165670011

    Legend of the Lost is a film that could have been pretty good, but was destroyed because of the lack of chemistry between the leads, John Wayne and Sophia Loren. They don't relate or react to each other at all, and every "intimate" scene between them seems forced.


    On the bright side, you have cinematographer Jack Cardiff's gorgeous on-location Technirama cinematography. The deserts of Libya never looked so good. And the script by Ben Hecht was actually quite good.


    But Legend of the Lost is a member of an entire genre (or sub-genre) of films that might best be called "Two-person Films." That is, the entire film centers on two or three characters that are somehow isolated from society and exist on their own in some desolate or deserted place. John Huston was a master of this genre, and his films The African Queen and Heaven Knows, Mr. Allison may very well be the best examples of the genre. Unfortunately for Legend of the Lost, this type of film mandates that there be great chemistry between the leads, or the whole film breaks down. Look at the great chemistry between Bogart and Hepburn in The African Queen and the great chemistry between Robert Mitchum and Deborah Kerr in Heaven Knows, Mr. Allison. This is where Legend of the Lost begins to come apart. Wayne was an actor who was legendary for his ability to relate to his leading ladies on screen. Throughout his six decade long career, he played opposite a wide variety of actresses (from Jean Arthur to Marlene Dietrich to Lauren Bacall to Katharine Hepburn) and was able to light up the screen with just about all of them. Unfortunately, for whatever reason, the chemistry between him and Loren just wasn't there. In hindsight, of course, its easy enough to clamor for Maureen O'Hara (who had done similar roles in the many "Arabian Knights" type adventure films she had spent most of the 40's doing), but I do give Wayne credit for taking a chance on the then almost unknown Loren. Unfortunately, things just didn't work out.


    Veteran director Henry Hathaway directed Legend of the Lost, and after its failure placed most of the blame on Loren, saying something to the effect that she was gorgeous to look at, but wasn't a very good actress. Although he might have had a point, Hathaway was also likely trying to deflect blame away from himself for the failure. The fact remains that he failed to overcome the casting problems that beset the film. And this is why Hathaway is remembered as a good, but not great director (and I say this as Hathaway's biggest fan). The great directors have the ability to elevate a film above script and casting problems, and Hathaway failed to do that here. Of course, Hathaway would say that given the material and genre it would have been very hard, if not impossible to do that here. And he may very well be right. In hindsight it might have been better to get John Huston himself to direct the film, though considering Wayne and Huston's equally disastrous joint project The Barbarian and the Geisha was still waiting in the future, perhaps its better Huston wasn't involved here.


    I've always felt that Legend of the Lost was Batjac's attempt at a "prestige picture." I think that Wayne was trying to impress the critics by producing an "artsy" film that would appeal to them, and when it failed, he went back to the familiar places and faces that he had found success with earlier in his career. It was probably a very wise decision on his part.


    Legend of the Lost is not for everyone. With different casting the film could have become a classic. As it is, it survives best as a remembrance of "what might have been."


    No, but Ringo wishes they were!!!!! :D:D

    Bob,


    I've always thought the horse JW refers to as "Sammy" in A Lady Takes A Chance was Steel, the horse he rode for his RKO films. I haven't checked it out carefully, though.

    "bump"


    Once again I'm going to say the "Off Topic Discussions" forum is too cluttered, this thing was already shoved way down on page 3.


    Anyways, Friday is the last day to vote, so if you haven't done so yet I'd recommend heading over there and voting right away.

    Quote

    Originally posted by bopoppa@Jun 24 2006, 10:52 PM
    True that Dukefan1. He made some great westerns in his own right. I'm trying to track down a DVD copy of a Jimmy Stewart movie called "Winchester???" fill in the date. Great flick from when I was younger. I dont know if its out, but I'm on the prowl.
    Bo

    [snapback]32451[/snapback]



    bopoppa,


    The film you are thinking of is Winchester '73 (1950). Its available on DVD from Universal. This DVD also contains an audio commentary by James Stewart himself (the only audio commentary he ever did for one of his films). In my opinion, Stewart's commentary is worth the price of the DVD alone.

    Rob,

    Jay is correct about The Alamo. In a nutshell, there was only one known copy of the Director's Cut of The Alamo in existence, and the fools at MGM destroyed it due to poor storage.

    You can read the whole sickening story in these old threads:

    http://www.dukewayne.com/thread624.html

    http://www.dukewayne.com/thread1237.html

    http://www.dukewayne.com/thread1495.html


    and in these news articles:

    http://www.jwayne.com/news/archives/00000028.shtml

    http://www.in70mm.com/news/2002/alamo/index.htm

    If you go to:


    http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/brows...9619002-9490357


    you can vote for future DVD releases from Warner Bros. Out of the 30 titles listed, the top 10 vote-getters will be released to DVD. No Duke titles, but some of these films are pretty good. I've always liked the 1951 version of Angels in the Outfield with Janet Leigh and Paul Douglas - it's much better then the Disney re-make from the 90's. The 1957 film Band of Angels (starring Clark Gable and Sidney Poitier in their only film together) is pretty good. So is Bhowani Junction (1956), starring Ava Gardner and Stewart Granger. Glenn Ford's 1960 Cimarron re-make is also quite good.


    Happy voting,


    E.J.